Food, Beverage & Specialty CPG · project showcase · wholesale sales assets
A buyer pack built around case packs, lead times and shelf life — not brand story
A food & beverage buyer's first questions are entirely operational, and most brand packs answer none of them until page eleven. This asset set is built the other way round: one product record, a line sheet that opens with the specification, and a sample-request route that still works when the pack is forwarded to someone who wasn't on the call.
At a glance
The engagement in brief
Services
- Content Systems
- Design
- Positioning
- Outbound
- Landing Pages
Stack
- Product data record
- Line sheet
- Sample request route
- Distributor and retailer templates
- Label and allergen fields
- Asset library
The situation
What we walked into
The pack is rarely read by the person it was presented to. It is forwarded to a category manager who was not on the call, opened on a phone between meetings, and given about ninety seconds. In that ninety seconds the reader is looking for case pack, unit cost, minimum order, lead time, shelf life on receipt and whether the label is compliant for their market. A pack that opens with a founder story makes them scroll, and scrolling is where a forward dies.
The pack has to work when it is forwarded to a category manager who was not on the call and will give it ninety seconds on a phone.
What we found
The diagnosis
01
The buyer's first questions are all operational
Case pack, unit cost, minimum order quantity, lead time, shelf life on receipt, label compliance. Six fields. Everything else in the pack is supporting material for a decision those six have already mostly made.
02
One product record, or the numbers will disagree
The same item appears in a line sheet, a portal upload, a sample request and a price list. Maintained separately they drift, and a buyer who spots two different case packs in the same pack stops trusting every number in it, including the ones that were right.
03
Shelf life is measured on receipt, not on production
A brand quoting production-dated shelf life and a buyer reading receipt-dated shelf life are using the same words for different quantities, and the difference is usually the reason a listing gets declined without explanation.
04
The sample is the actual call to action
A sample request route that takes an address, a quantity and a delivery date beats a contact form, because it is the one action a buyer can take without an internal approval. The pack is designed to end there rather than at a meeting request.
The number behind it
What this is built around
In F&B the first order rarely pays for itself — category CPA now runs **~$45–53** (Foundry CRO 2026) — so the business is repeat-purchase by arithmetic. Wholesale, reorder-driven buying is the model that works, and it's won on operational specifics, not story.
What we built
The system
One record per item holds every field a buyer, a portal or a distributor template might ask for, and everything downstream is generated from it: line sheet, price ladder, portal upload, sample request route. Photography follows a fixed standard with a white-background pack shot and an in-situ shot per item, so a range shot over several months still sits together on a shelf plan. Every sheet carries a version and a date in the footer, because the most damaging document in a wholesale conversation is a stale price list that nobody realises is stale.
The sequence
How it was delivered
Week 1
Record design
Field schema covering specification, compliance, pricing and imagery; existing sheets reconciled
Owner: OmniFlow + client ops
Weeks 2–3
Line sheet and exports
Specification-first line sheet, portal and distributor templates generated from the record
Owner: OmniFlow
Weeks 2–4
Photography
White-background and in-situ standard, full range shot against it
Owner: OmniFlow + client
Week 4
Sample route
Sample request path taking address, quantity and date, with a versioned confirmation
Owner: OmniFlow
Outcome
What shipped
This entry makes no performance claim. It documents an asset system and the constraint it was designed against: the pack has to survive being forwarded, opened on a phone, and read for ninety seconds by somebody with no context. That constraint is why the specification sits on page two, why every sheet is versioned and dated, and why the sample request is the only call to action in the document.
Reporting
What you would actually see
These are the surfaces this engagement is run and measured from, shown with representative figures built around the benchmarks cited on this page. Every account we run reports into views like these, and you keep ownership of all of them.
These are demo dashboards. They show the reporting surfaces this engagement is run and measured from, with representative figures generated around the published benchmarks cited on this page — not a client account and not a client result. Live reporting for your own account replaces every number here.
Google Analytics 4
Food, Beverage & Specialty CPG · all web data
Sessions
5,955
+56.8%
Key events
222
+71.0%
Session key event rate
3.7%
+1.0%
Engagement rate
64.3%
+4.4%
Sessions by month
Dashed line marks the month the engagement started.
| Session default channel group | Sessions | Key events | Rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Organic Search | 2,464 | 99 | 4.0% |
| Paid Search | 1,550 | 80 | 5.2% |
| Direct | 946 | 33 | 3.5% |
| Referral | 542 | 22 | 4.1% |
| Organic Social | 452 | 24 | 5.3% |
LinkedIn Campaign Manager
Sponsored Content · Food, Beverage & Specialty CPG audience
Impressions
97,134
+42.3%
Clicks
452
+46.6%
CTR
0.5%
+0.17%
Cost per lead
$178.36
-17.1%
Impressions by month
Dashed line marks the month the engagement started.
| Campaign | Impr. | Clicks | Leads | CPL |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thought leadership — practice leads | 33,026 | 154 | 12 | $178.36 |
| Problem-aware — retargeting | 25,255 | 118 | 9 | $178.36 |
| Case study download | 21,369 | 100 | 8 | $178.36 |
| Webinar registration | 17,484 | 81 | 6 | $178.36 |
Honestly
What we would do differently
The first pack led with the brand and put the specification at the back, because that is how a deck is normally built and nobody questioned it. Buyers scrolled past the front half looking for the sheet and several never found it. The specification moved to page two and the story moved in behind it, which is the opposite of every instinct in the room at the time.
Next
Start the same conversation
Start the same conversation
Tell us what you are working on and we will say plainly whether this is the right shape of engagement for it.