Skip to main content

    Food, Beverage & Specialty CPG · project showcase · wholesale sales assets

    Project ShowcaseReal client work that shipped. No performance figures are published, because none have been verified and approved for release.

    A buyer pack built around case packs, lead times and shelf life — not brand story

    A food & beverage buyer's first questions are entirely operational, and most brand packs answer none of them until page eleven. This asset set is built the other way round: one product record, a line sheet that opens with the specification, and a sample-request route that still works when the pack is forwarded to someone who wasn't on the call.

    At a glance

    The engagement in brief

    Services

    • Content Systems
    • Design
    • Positioning
    • Outbound
    • Landing Pages

    Stack

    • Product data record
    • Line sheet
    • Sample request route
    • Distributor and retailer templates
    • Label and allergen fields
    • Asset library

    The situation

    What we walked into

    The pack is rarely read by the person it was presented to. It is forwarded to a category manager who was not on the call, opened on a phone between meetings, and given about ninety seconds. In that ninety seconds the reader is looking for case pack, unit cost, minimum order, lead time, shelf life on receipt and whether the label is compliant for their market. A pack that opens with a founder story makes them scroll, and scrolling is where a forward dies.

    The pack has to work when it is forwarded to a category manager who was not on the call and will give it ninety seconds on a phone.

    What we found

    The diagnosis

    1. 01

      The buyer's first questions are all operational

      Case pack, unit cost, minimum order quantity, lead time, shelf life on receipt, label compliance. Six fields. Everything else in the pack is supporting material for a decision those six have already mostly made.

    2. 02

      One product record, or the numbers will disagree

      The same item appears in a line sheet, a portal upload, a sample request and a price list. Maintained separately they drift, and a buyer who spots two different case packs in the same pack stops trusting every number in it, including the ones that were right.

    3. 03

      Shelf life is measured on receipt, not on production

      A brand quoting production-dated shelf life and a buyer reading receipt-dated shelf life are using the same words for different quantities, and the difference is usually the reason a listing gets declined without explanation.

    4. 04

      The sample is the actual call to action

      A sample request route that takes an address, a quantity and a delivery date beats a contact form, because it is the one action a buyer can take without an internal approval. The pack is designed to end there rather than at a meeting request.

    The number behind it

    What this is built around

    In F&B the first order rarely pays for itself — category CPA now runs **~$45–53** (Foundry CRO 2026) — so the business is repeat-purchase by arithmetic. Wholesale, reorder-driven buying is the model that works, and it's won on operational specifics, not story.

    What we built

    The system

    One record per item holds every field a buyer, a portal or a distributor template might ask for, and everything downstream is generated from it: line sheet, price ladder, portal upload, sample request route. Photography follows a fixed standard with a white-background pack shot and an in-situ shot per item, so a range shot over several months still sits together on a shelf plan. Every sheet carries a version and a date in the footer, because the most damaging document in a wholesale conversation is a stale price list that nobody realises is stale.

    A buyer pack built around case packs, lead times and shelf life — not brand story — stackA stack of 9 connected layers, from "Single product data record" through to "Versioned asset library", each feeding the one below it.Single product data recordCase pack and minimum orderLead time and shelf lifeAllergen and label complianceRetail price ladderLine sheetPortal and distributor exportsSample request routeVersioned asset library

    The sequence

    How it was delivered

    1. Week 1

      Record design

      Field schema covering specification, compliance, pricing and imagery; existing sheets reconciled

      Owner: OmniFlow + client ops

    2. Weeks 2–3

      Line sheet and exports

      Specification-first line sheet, portal and distributor templates generated from the record

      Owner: OmniFlow

    3. Weeks 2–4

      Photography

      White-background and in-situ standard, full range shot against it

      Owner: OmniFlow + client

    4. Week 4

      Sample route

      Sample request path taking address, quantity and date, with a versioned confirmation

      Owner: OmniFlow

    Outcome

    What shipped

    This entry makes no performance claim. It documents an asset system and the constraint it was designed against: the pack has to survive being forwarded, opened on a phone, and read for ninety seconds by somebody with no context. That constraint is why the specification sits on page two, why every sheet is versioned and dated, and why the sample request is the only call to action in the document.

    Reporting

    What you would actually see

    These are the surfaces this engagement is run and measured from, shown with representative figures built around the benchmarks cited on this page. Every account we run reports into views like these, and you keep ownership of all of them.

    These are demo dashboards. They show the reporting surfaces this engagement is run and measured from, with representative figures generated around the published benchmarks cited on this page — not a client account and not a client result. Live reporting for your own account replaces every number here.

    Google Analytics 4

    Food, Beverage & Specialty CPG · all web data

    Demo
    Acquisition overview
    Last 12 months vs. preceding period

    Sessions

    5,955

    +56.8%

    Key events

    222

    +71.0%

    Session key event rate

    3.7%

    +1.0%

    Engagement rate

    64.3%

    +4.4%

    Sessions by month

    AprJunAugOctDecFeb

    Dashed line marks the month the engagement started.

    Session default channel groupSessionsKey eventsRate
    Organic Search2,464994.0%
    Paid Search1,550805.2%
    Direct946333.5%
    Referral542224.1%
    Organic Social452245.3%

    LinkedIn Campaign Manager

    Sponsored Content · Food, Beverage & Specialty CPG audience

    Demo
    Campaign performance
    Last 12 months

    Impressions

    97,134

    +42.3%

    Clicks

    452

    +46.6%

    CTR

    0.5%

    +0.17%

    Cost per lead

    $178.36

    -17.1%

    Impressions by month

    AprJunAugOctDecFeb

    Dashed line marks the month the engagement started.

    CampaignImpr.ClicksLeadsCPL
    Thought leadership — practice leads33,02615412$178.36
    Problem-aware — retargeting25,2551189$178.36
    Case study download21,3691008$178.36
    Webinar registration17,484816$178.36

    Honestly

    What we would do differently

    The first pack led with the brand and put the specification at the back, because that is how a deck is normally built and nobody questioned it. Buyers scrolled past the front half looking for the sheet and several never found it. The specification moved to page two and the story moved in behind it, which is the opposite of every instinct in the room at the time.

    Next

    Start the same conversation

    Start the same conversation

    Tell us what you are working on and we will say plainly whether this is the right shape of engagement for it.

    We use your details only to respond to this request. No lists, no resale.