Skip to main content

    Solution

    Look like the choice a careful buyer would make

    Positioning, identity and creative systems that make the decision easier — built to be used consistently by your team, not admired once in a presentation.

    Why this exists

    The business problem

    Most businesses that feel like they have a brand problem actually have a positioning problem. The work is good, the difference is real, and none of it is legible from the outside — so buyers default to comparing price.

    Underneath that sits inconsistency: three logo variants in circulation, colours that shift by platform, proposals that look nothing like the website, and a tone of voice that changes with whoever wrote the page.

    The cost is subtle but compounding. Every inconsistency asks the buyer to do a little more work to trust you.

    Fit

    Who this is for

    A good fit if

    • Businesses that have outgrown an identity created in their first year
    • Firms competing on trust where perceived quality directly affects fees
    • Companies merging, rebranding or entering a new segment
    • Teams producing marketing material with no system, slowly and inconsistently

    Probably not a fit if

    • Anyone wanting a logo in isolation with no positioning work
    • Businesses whose real problem is demand generation — a rebrand will not fix an empty pipeline
    • Organisations with no internal decision-maker for brand approval

    Scope

    What is included — and what is not

    Scope written plainly, so there is no argument later about what was assumed.

    Positioning and messaging

    Audience, alternatives, difference and proof, resolved into language your team can repeat without a script.

    Visual identity

    Logo system, colour, typography, imagery direction and layout principles designed for real applications.

    Brand guidelines

    A practical usage document covering the situations your team actually encounters, not a 90-page theory piece.

    Asset library

    Templates for proposals, decks, social, signage, email and print — editable by your team.

    Tone of voice

    Written standards with examples, including what your brand deliberately does not say.

    Creative production

    Campaign concepts, ad creative, photography direction and motion where the channel warrants it.

    Brand centre

    A single place your team and partners can pull correct, current assets from.

    Rollout plan

    Sequenced application across site, collateral, signage and profiles so the change lands rather than dribbles out.

    Explicitly not included

    • Trademark registration or legal clearance (we will flag risks and recommend counsel)
    • Guaranteed sales impact from a rebrand
    • Printing, signage manufacture or production costs
    • Stock or commissioned photography licensing unless scoped
    • Naming legal searches

    How it works

    The working process

    1. Discovery

      Week 1–3

      Stakeholder and customer interviews, competitor review, and an honest read on whether brand is really the constraint.

    2. Positioning

      Week 3–5

      Strategy, messaging hierarchy and proof points agreed before any visual work begins.

    3. Identity design

      Week 5–9

      Concepts, refinement and application testing across the surfaces you actually use.

    4. System build

      Week 9–12

      Guidelines, templates and the brand centre, plus a training session for the team.

    5. Rollout

      Week 12+

      Phased application with a checklist, so nothing is left showing the old identity six months later.

    Measurement

    KPIs we monitor

    Brand is harder to measure than paid media, which is exactly why the measures need defining up front rather than after.

    Brand search volume

    Searches for your company name over time — the cleanest available proxy for awareness.

    Direct traffic share

    Visitors arriving without a referrer, tracked as a share of total sessions.

    Asset adoption

    Share of outgoing material using current brand templates — a real problem in most organisations.

    Proposal win rate

    Tracked before and after rollout, acknowledging that many factors move it.

    Message consistency audit

    Periodic review of live surfaces against the guidelines, scored.

    Production turnaround

    Time to produce standard marketing material, which the template system should reduce noticeably.

    Expectations

    Realistic timeline

    Identity work takes about a quarter to do properly. Rollout takes longer than anyone plans for.

    Weeks 1–5

    Discovery and positioning. The hardest and most valuable phase — and the one clients most often want to skip.

    Weeks 5–9

    Identity design and application testing across real surfaces.

    Weeks 9–12

    Guidelines, templates and brand centre delivered, team trained.

    Months 3–9

    Rollout and adoption. Brand search and direct traffic effects, if they appear, appear slowly.

    Commercials

    What this costs

    Published bands rather than a quote on request. Where you land inside one depends on scope, and it is confirmed in writing before anything begins.

    Branding & Creative

    $3,200–$5,000/mo

    Monthly management and delivery fee. Media budget and third-party software are billed separately and never marked up through us.

    • Branding & Graphic Design

      Moves with asset volume and how much of the identity system is built from scratch.

      $3,200–$5,000/mo

    • 3D Animation & Motion

      Moves with runtime, render complexity and the number of revision cycles.

      $4,000–$22,000/mo

    Relevant packages

    Productised starting points that bundle several services. A package is never priced above what its component services would cost separately.

    • Bands are monthly management and delivery fees. Media budget, software, hosting and other third-party costs are billed separately and never marked up through us.
    • Where a service is quoted inside a package, the package price applies — a bundle is never priced above what its component services would cost separately.
    • Final position inside a band depends on scope, market and current baseline, and is confirmed in writing after a discovery call before anything begins.
    • Larger or bespoke scopes are quoted individually from discovery rather than from a standing band.
    • Media spend (Google Ads, Meta, LinkedIn, or any other paid platform) is billed separately by the platform and is not included unless a package explicitly says otherwise.
    • Software, hosting, domains, call tracking, review platforms, backlink or placement purchases and other third-party costs are separate unless explicitly included.
    • Results are not guaranteed. We do not publish or promise lead volumes, rankings, revenue or ROAS.
    • Final scope depends on your market, geography, competition and current baseline. Scope is confirmed after a discovery call.
    • “Starting at” pricing represents the minimum typical engagement for that package, not a fixed quote.

    Questions

    Frequently asked

    Proof

    Branding & Creative engagements

    Labelled by evidence type: a verified result carries measured figures, a showcase is real work published without figures, and a capability model is a system we run, never a client account.

    Project ShowcaseReal client work that shipped. No performance figures are published, because none have been verified and approved for release.Construction & Contracting

    A 21-column content calendar built so a contractor's crew can actually run it

    Most content calendars for trade businesses fail because they're written for marketers. This one is built around what a contractor's day actually produces: a job-site photo, a question a customer asked, a seasonal pressure everyone in the region already understands.

    ContentOrganic SocialContent Systems
    Verified ResultReal client work. Every figure is measured in a named system and carries the window it was measured over.Home Services

    A 4.8 on Google and a 4.3 on Facebook: rebuilding the reputation layer a trade business is actually judged on

    A regional exterior-building-services contractor carried a strong Google rating and a materially weaker Facebook one — on the platform its paid social pointed at. We built the review-and-response layer under both, set a narrow rule for when a review is disputed, and put a daily operating cadence behind the proof assets that make a review request reasonable to send.

    4.8Google rating, primary profileGoogle Business ProfileLocal SEOOrganic Social
    Project ShowcaseReal client work that shipped. No performance figures are published, because none have been verified and approved for release.Home Services

    A review-response procedure a crew can run at nine at night without calling the agency

    Reviews arrive at weekends and after hours, and the person best placed to answer is almost never a marketer. This is the written procedure that decides who responds, in what shape, how fast, and the narrow test that must be met before a review is contested at all.

    Google Business ProfileOrganic SocialContent Systems
    All case studies

    Talk through a brand and positioning review

    We look at how you currently present, where the inconsistencies are and whether brand is genuinely your constraint right now.

    We use your details only to respond to this request. No lists, no resale.